The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 December 2021, 12:52 PM   #1
sm84
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 77
Bergeon Spring Bar Tweezers, Whats so special?

Hi All,

I recently saw a post here about swapping bracelets and one of the tools that were used for that was a Bergeon Spring Bar tweezer.

I personally like this tool as I've often struggled with removing bracelets and usually did this using a spring bar tool than a tweezer.

I, however, cannot understand what is so special about the Bergeon tweezers as opposed to something like Horofix tweezers or similarly designed tweezers that can easily be purchased for around $30.

Can someone help me understand why the Bergeon is preferred? Can we use the less expensive ones to achieve the same result without damaging a watch as expensive as a Rolex?
sm84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 12:56 PM   #2
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,510
The law of deminishing returns?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 01:00 PM   #3
Jocke
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Jocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
Bergeon is a high quality tool, Horofix is not bad either. Then there are tools that are really bad with a bad fit and bad material that easily
breaks or slips. So why save a few bucks when buying a high quality watch? In my ears it rhymes badly but we all make our choices.
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish.

What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom?

Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional
photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute.
Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 01:40 PM   #4
JC316
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: JC
Location: Korea
Posts: 456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke View Post
Bergeon is a high quality tool, Horofix is not bad either. Then there are tools that are really bad with a bad fit and bad material that easily

breaks or slips. So why save a few bucks when buying a high quality watch? In my ears it rhymes badly but we all make our choices.
I never tried the Horofix but I love my Bergeon tool. I've read that the Bergeon makes a better quality tool. I suppose it's a matter of opinion.

Sent from my SM-G977N using Tapatalk
JC316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 02:00 PM   #5
Koolpep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Ralf
Location: Dubai
Watch: Sky-Dweller TT Jub
Posts: 228
Bergeon makes good quality tools. Horofix too. At the beginning of my watch journey I got a few cheap tools and man, do I and my watches regret that…..

However if you want to get the very best: Petitpierre

https://youtu.be/7oCCzVpWmhw
Koolpep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 02:02 PM   #6
interestedinwatches
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: nyc
Posts: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by sm84 View Post
Hi All,

I recently saw a post here about swapping bracelets and one of the tools that were used for that was a Bergeon Spring Bar tweezer.

I personally like this tool as I've often struggled with removing bracelets and usually did this using a spring bar tool than a tweezer.

I, however, cannot understand what is so special about the Bergeon tweezers as opposed to something like Horofix tweezers or similarly designed tweezers that can easily be purchased for around $30.

Can someone help me understand why the Bergeon is preferred? Can we use the less expensive ones to achieve the same result without damaging a watch as expensive as a Rolex?
Same reason Rolex costs way more than Tudor even though the quality is very similar. Branding.
interestedinwatches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 05:04 PM   #7
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koolpep View Post
Bergeon makes good quality tools. Horofix too. At the beginning of my watch journey I got a few cheap tools and man, do I and my watches regret that…..

However if you want to get the very best: Petitpierre

https://youtu.be/7oCCzVpWmhw
Beautiful, not very useful for Rolex bracelets though.

I just pay crazy prices for the official Rolex tools. Buy cheap, pay twice and mess up.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 05:23 PM   #8
dpt.calvin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,270
Bergeon is out. Nam Hing is king (look it up).
__________________
16570 | 16710 | 116710 | 116500
76214 | 79090 | 79030 | 79830
dpt.calvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 05:25 PM   #9
kieselguhr
"TRF" Member
 
kieselguhr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,619
Bergeon Spring Bar Tweezers, Whats so special?

Bergeon is just a brand name. If you have good experience using something cheaper, my recommendation is that you stick with it
kieselguhr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 07:46 PM   #10
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,647
There's nothing wrong with Horofix or Bergeon. You should use the tool(s) that you prefer to work with. If you can't see the point of something, you probably don't need it. Much comes down to the competence of the person using the tools, but cheap stuff seldom works out cheap in the long run.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 08:50 PM   #11
rajurama
"TRF" Member
 
rajurama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Rick
Location: Wakanda
Watch: amacallit
Posts: 2,090
Quality never comes cheap... Re Read and repeat!
__________________
रोलेक्स
rajurama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 11:32 PM   #12
JR16
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,251
Bergeon and Horofix are both good quality and have been around , so replacement parts will always be easy to get . Like anything, you pay for quality and reputation. Would stay away from no-name brands , worth the few extra $$ when buying tools to work on expensive watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
JR16 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 12:53 AM   #13
rlj676
"TRF" Member
 
rlj676's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: detroit
Posts: 539
I got a Horofix and it was able to help get bracelet off, but couldn’t use it to Add a rubber strap to save my life. Had to use a cheap no name spring bar tool. Probably some wear on the blnr from this debacle…
rlj676 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 12:57 AM   #14
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,087
Have four or five different types. The Bergeon has a great ease and feel / feedback while using it, plus it seems to 'grab' the springbar with a bit more confidence. jmho
__________________
__________________

----> TAMPA Meetup In December 2024 <----
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=13450519

Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school.
www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 01:13 AM   #15
Number3
"TRF" Member
 
Number3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London
Watch: 114060LB
Posts: 3,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpt.calvin View Post
Bergeon is out. Nam Hing is king (look it up).
Looks interesting.
Number3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 01:30 AM   #16
Cryten
"TRF" Member
 
Cryten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Terrafirma
Posts: 2,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlj676 View Post
I got a Horofix and it was able to help get bracelet off, but couldn’t use it to Add a rubber strap to save my life. Had to use a cheap no name spring bar tool. Probably some wear on the blnr from this debacle…
That's probably because they're not designed to be used on straps. There's no room for them to work on a strap, the forks are designed to go into the cut outs in the end link of a bracelet.
Cryten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 02:04 AM   #17
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,378
The difference between Snap-On and Craftsman? Functionally, none. But one is more of a pleasure to hold.
Kevin of Larchmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 02:19 AM   #18
dpt.calvin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number3 View Post
Looks interesting.
I got mine last week and used it for the first time. It works wonderfully!
__________________
16570 | 16710 | 116710 | 116500
76214 | 79090 | 79030 | 79830
dpt.calvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 04:45 AM   #19
214270Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
"Proper tool for a proper job", as my father used to say.
Cheap tools break or bend and cause damage.
Believe me - I know from firsthand experience with cheap automotive wrenches.
__________________
The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind

Rolex "some"
Tudor "some"
Damasko "some"
Misc Pieces "some"
Marathon "some"
GS Spring Drive "some"
Hamilton "some"
Findeisen "some"
214270Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 04:48 AM   #20
rlj676
"TRF" Member
 
rlj676's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: detroit
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cryten View Post
That's probably because they're not designed to be used on straps. There's no room for them to work on a strap, the forks are designed to go into the cut outs in the end link of a bracelet.
Would certainly explain it. Was just very difficult to align everything lol.
rlj676 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 05:49 AM   #21
seabreeze
2024 Pledge Member
 
seabreeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
Sorry to revive another years old thread but I search before starting new threads.
Is there a recommendation between the 7825 (smaller) and 6825?
Seems the smaller would be fine for all rolex cases ? except maybe daytona? But the other may be too big for many?
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013
Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967
Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007
Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985
Sold but wish I didn't
Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972
seabreeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 06:25 AM   #22
KatGirl
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabreeze View Post
Sorry to revive another years old thread but I search before starting new threads.
Is there a recommendation between the 7825 (smaller) and 6825?
Seems the smaller would be fine for all rolex cases ? except maybe daytona? But the other may be too big for many?

I have the 7825, which is recommended for tight tolerances,,which describes Rolex.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 06:59 AM   #23
Flypanam
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Flypanam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 128
Part of it is branding, for sure. However, the reputation is such as it is for a reason.

I have used lower quality spring bar tools of various types (tweezer style, standard style, etc). Bergeon are high quality, and the heads where they actually grab onto the flanges of the spring bar are very well made, with the right shape and size. I've used crappy tools which do not fit correctly into the space between the bracelet and lugs, or which do not grasp onto the spring bars well, ended up scratching up my watches and bracelets. It's a good investment. The smaller one (7825) as Kat describes is the best one to use for Rolex, otherwise you will scratch the heck out of the back of your lugs, like I have.
__________________
GMT Master II 126720VTNR; GMT Master II 16710 Pepsi; Cosmograph Daytona 116523; Yachtmaster 40 126622; Datejust 36 126234
Tudor: BB Chrono Reverse Panda; Pelagos FXN MN
Omega: Speedmaster DSoTM Apollo 8; Speedmaster BSoTM Aventurine; Planet Ocean 43.5
IWC: AMG Petronas F1 Pilot Chrono; Mark XVIII
Best of the rest: Cartier Santos Blue XL; Hermes H08 Madison LE; JLC Grande Reverso 273.8.04; Ming 17.09 Burgundy; Nomos Tangente 50 ans de Médecins Sans Frontières; Panerai Luminor PAM1085 Blu Mare
Flypanam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 07:23 AM   #24
fsprow
2024 Pledge Member
 
fsprow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,543
I find the Bergeon tool very well made and it works well for removing a bracelet. However, the Nam Hing tool is much better for installing a bracelet since it is easy to maintain pressure until the spring bars are in place.
fsprow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 07:40 AM   #25
Calatrava r
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,381
A good rule for me is to buy the best possible tools quality wise for the job. As someone said cheaper tools may be made of inferior alloys which can bend and misshapen in use resulting in damage to the item being worked on. Whether the higher price on a particular tool brand is justified requires some research into it. As a Rolex watch costs at least 10K, on average, I am not worried about overspending on a screwdriver or spring bar tweezers.
Calatrava r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 07:51 AM   #26
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calatrava r View Post
A good rule for me is to buy the best possible tools quality wise for the job.
Good advice.

I've progressed to this for removing/attaching bracelets to bodies:



The Bergon still gives dependable service at the clasp end and straps without QD pins.

Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 08:38 AM   #27
Goose 104
"TRF" Member
 
Goose 104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Watch: 126622
Posts: 960
The bergron tweezers make removal easy but I find it so hard to put the bracelet back on with them
__________________
♛126622 Rhodium // ♛126234 Blue //♛126613LB // ♛126000 Green + more ♛
76213 Prince Date+Day // Black Bay 58 // Black Bay Harrods // Heritage Advisor // Vertex M100 + more...
Goose 104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 08:51 AM   #28
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,087
+1 for the Nam Hing springbar tool. Also makes it easy to reinstall the bracelet too.

https://www.esslinger.com/premium-sp...-removal-tool/
__________________
__________________

----> TAMPA Meetup In December 2024 <----
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=13450519

Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school.
www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 09:02 AM   #29
favx
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpt.calvin View Post
Bergeon is out. Nam Hing is king (look it up).
I check and I can say is it looks interesting.
favx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2024, 12:48 PM   #30
painexpert
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 627
I have used both tweezers and they are both good. Can't really tell the difference concerning effectiveness between the two. Thats why I have the less expensive Horofix now. I am always afraid of not maintaining the pressure on the tweezers and having a springbar fly into "no mans land" forever. I like my other old method better: I tape up the lugs with painters tape. I have the very, very small fork removal tool (this is key). I thinks its diameter is 1mm or 0.8 mm.I easily remove one side of the spring bar with my lighted magnifying glasses and then I just pull the other side out. The tape is a lifesaver or a lugsaver, Haha!!
painexpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
rolex , spring bar tool , tools


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.