The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 December 2022, 12:58 PM   #1
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Finally figured out Explorer bracelet taper!

It finally hit me today: The reason for the proportions/bracelet taper on the 124270, as well as the decision to make the proportions/shape/lugs different from the DJ it used to share a case with. Viewed from most angles, this watch has a more angular appearance than the other 36mm pieces.

What I see is Rolex's attempt to capture the silhouette of the very in-vogue integrated bracelet watches. AP/PP/VC/GP integrated bracelet sports watches all have significantly greater lug and bracelet taper than watches like the Date Just.

While the Explorer is every bit classic Rolex, I think it captures just enough of those lines to be on trend for today without reviving the OQ-type actual integrated bracelet design.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2022, 01:00 PM   #2
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,907
Interesting assessment, you could be right.
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2022, 02:35 PM   #3
Watchsprings
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,955
Oh no, was I not supposed to put it on a leather strap!
Attached Images
 
Watchsprings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2022, 06:44 PM   #4
StillTrying
"TRF" Member
 
StillTrying's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Space
Watch: 16570, black
Posts: 965
I 100% agree with you. The only Rolex I’ve owned that I’ve thought had an integrated look.
StillTrying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2022, 07:56 PM   #5
Emery
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Aus
Posts: 435
As a RO owner, I can’t say I agree with the integrated silhouette bit.

But as someone with small wrists, I’m eternally grateful for both the 36mm case width and the 19/14 bracelet :D
Emery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2022, 11:43 PM   #6
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emery View Post
As a RO owner, I can’t say I agree with the integrated silhouette bit.

But as someone with small wrists, I’m eternally grateful for both the 36mm case width and the 19/14 bracelet :D
Well, you happen to have the integrated bracelet watch... And nothing is as angular as the RO. More in line with the VC OS or Laureato. And definitely more of an "inspired by" as opposed to a genuine attempt at an integrated bracelet design. At least IMO.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2022, 11:44 PM   #7
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchsprings View Post
Oh no, was I not supposed to put it on a leather strap!
Many an integrated bracelet watch has had a successful leather strap version .

However I do wonder if this is why some have had a more difficult time finding the right leather strap for the 124270?
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2022, 12:05 AM   #8
OrangeSport
"TRF" Member
 
OrangeSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
If they want an integrated look they should look back...
Attached Images
 
__________________
OrangeSport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2022, 12:10 AM   #9
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeSport View Post
If they want an integrated look they should look back...
While I don't ever see Rolex adopting that style for the Explorer, I am a little surprised that this one never made a comeback.

With the Explorer I see more of a desire to capture some of the lines and silhouette of the integrated bracelet watches, given the design popularity, without actually creating one.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2022, 12:43 AM   #10
jkumar2324
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: US
Posts: 17
Do you feel the same about the new sub with the same 5mm of taper (albeit starting at 21mm instead of 19)?
jkumar2324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2022, 01:20 AM   #11
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkumar2324 View Post
Do you feel the same about the new sub with the same 5mm of taper (albeit starting at 21mm instead of 19)?
No, for two reasons:

1. Sub lugs are just so much thicker that the taper doesn't "flow" from the case to the bracelet (the way integrated bracelet watches do by definition).

2. Never seen an integrated bracelet watch well executed with a dive bezel. Doesn't mean nobody has tried, nor that it's impossible, but never seen it really work and maintain the silhouette.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2022, 04:13 AM   #12
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyp View Post
. . .
What I see is Rolex's attempt to capture the silhouette of the very in-vogue integrated bracelet watches. AP/PP/VC/GP integrated bracelet sports watches all have significantly greater lug and bracelet taper than watches like the Date Just.

. . .
No, they're not.

The newer bracelets have an additional removable link. Since all of the removable links are the same, the fewer links left on the permanent set need a sharper angle to get down to the same width as those removables.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2022, 05:40 AM   #13
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
No, they're not.

The newer bracelets have an additional removable link. Since all of the removable links are the same, the fewer links left on the permanent set need a sharper angle to get down to the same width as those removables.
Sure, the change you describe does require more sharply angled permanent links, but it doesn't dictate the degree of overall taper. I'm referring to the decision to taper the lugs to 19mm and the end links to 14 in the first place. Rolex could have followed tradition and used the same case as the DJ (now OP36, too), with its 20mm lugs and 4mm taper.

This greater overall taper, along with what appear to be sharper, more angular lines throughout, are what led me to this conclusion.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2022, 04:17 PM   #14
MRBolton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Watch: ing my wrist
Posts: 1,268
My Sub41 bracelet feels more integrated than my current model Explorer 1 bracelet.

The taper really is super aggressive. I have trouble also getting the clasp to have a nicely centered fit.
MRBolton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.