The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 March 2023, 06:44 AM   #1
watchik
"TRF" Member
 
watchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 264
New movement for the Rolex SkyDweller? (9001 vs 9002?))

From Hodinkee:

"The Sky-Dweller is now equipped with calibre 9002, an evolution of calibre 9001. This new movement includes the Chronergy escapement and is fitted with a blue Parachrom hairspring, made in a paramagnetic alloy. The power reserve of caliber 9002 extends to approximately 72 hours."

The previous movement already had all that. If you compare the descriptions on Rolex website, both movements are identical - see screenshots. So what was really changed if anything?

Name:  Screenshot 2023-03-27 at 12.24.13 PM.png
Views: 732
Size:  209.8 KB
Name:  IMG_4068.jpg
Views: 719
Size:  151.3 KB
watchik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2023, 06:47 AM   #2
Flyer737
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 183
Would like to know, seems like minor tweaks.
__________________
Flyer737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2023, 06:49 AM   #3
watchik
"TRF" Member
 
watchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer737 View Post
Would like to know, seems like minor tweaks.
Well, the price remained the same. If Rolex changed something, they would have used the opportunity to raise the prices. They didn't. Did the original movement have any issues they had to address? I am now aware of any.
watchik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2023, 06:58 AM   #4
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,172
My first release SS SkyD was a daily beater for over a year, no issues. Super solid timepiece! That's why i want Rolex to make a perpetual calendar
__________________
__________________

----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <----
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133

Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school.
www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2023, 07:28 AM   #5
Driver8
"TRF" Member
 
Driver8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchik View Post
From Hodinkee:

"The Sky-Dweller is now equipped with calibre 9002, an evolution of calibre 9001. This new movement includes the Chronergy escapement and is fitted with a blue Parachrom hairspring, made in a paramagnetic alloy. The power reserve of caliber 9002 extends to approximately 72 hours."

The previous movement already had all that. If you compare the descriptions on Rolex website, both movements are identical - see screenshots. So what was really changed if anything?
The 9001 never had the Chronergy escapement when it was first introduced as the 9001 came out in 2012 and it was another 3 years till Rolex developed the Chronergy escapement. It did already have a 72 hour PR though.
__________________
Rolex - 116710BLNR : 116610LN : 116622 : 116334 : 14060M
(Plus - Glashutte Original, Breitling, Omega, IWC, Tag Heuer, Doxa, Sinn, Seiko, G-Shock + micros)
Driver8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2023, 10:17 AM   #6
watchik
"TRF" Member
 
watchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver8 View Post
The 9001 never had the Chronergy escapement when it was first introduced as the 9001 came out in 2012 and it was another 3 years till Rolex developed the Chronergy escapement. It did already have a 72 hour PR though.
Thanks, I thought it was already there. I am shocked that Rolex did not use that opportunity to raise the price. It's now like the watches will be sitting on the shelves...
watchik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2023, 10:21 AM   #7
watchik
"TRF" Member
 
watchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 264
Just found the press release:

"The Sky-Dweller is now equipped with calibre 9002. An evolution of calibre 9001, this new movement includes some of the major innovations that Rolex has brought to its movements, including the Chronergy escapement."

https://newsroom.rolex.com/watches/n...es/sky-dweller
watchik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2023, 10:31 AM   #8
watchik
"TRF" Member
 
watchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 264
Btw, Rolex does not even mention the Chronergy escapement on their website:

https://www.rolex.com/en-us/watches/...r/m336934-0004

Weird.
watchik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2024, 11:40 AM   #9
handyhsl
"TRF" Member
 
handyhsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bandung
Watch: GMT II C
Posts: 261
So, 9002 and 9001 are 99% the same ?
__________________
GMT “Black Panther”
AK 126900
handyhsl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2024, 12:32 PM   #10
Patekfinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: NYC
Posts: 481
There is also a difference on the face of the dial. New 9002 sky dwellers have two small crowns at 6 o clock on the dial, whereas 9001 sky dwellers have NO crowns at 6 o clock on the dial. This in the only physical difference on the face of the watch.

The 9002 began manufacture in 2023, and there are a lot of deceptive sellers on Chrono24 advertising “2023” Sky Dwellers which were actually manufactured in 2022 but SOLD in 2023 with 2023 as the date on the papers, but they in fact have the old 9001 movement. So when buying a sky dweller from a gray, just because they say it’s a 2023 does NOT mean it is ACTUALLY a 2023 with the 9002 movement, it means it was only sold in 2023. This is a huge red flag and can be verified by zooming in on the dial.

For reference numbers, the new 2023 sky dweller with 9002 movement carries reference 336934 whereas the old version carries the old reference 326934.

Here is a photo of the two crowns at 6 o clock where it says Swiss made. The old 2022 manufactured and prior sky dwellers do NOT have this. In this photo they look like dots because of the low resolution, but they are actually tiny crowns.






And here is the OLD 9001 movement skydweller dial with NO crowns at 6 o clock:




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Patekfinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2024, 12:34 PM   #11
Patekfinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: NYC
Posts: 481
Quote:
Originally Posted by handyhsl View Post
So, 9002 and 9001 are 99% the same ?

The biggest change IMO is the new 9002 movement is more resistant to magnetism. The older 9001 movement was very easily magnetized and caused problems for many owners, so increasing the resistance to magnetism was one of the major benefits of the new movement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Patekfinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2024, 02:17 PM   #12
handyhsl
"TRF" Member
 
handyhsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bandung
Watch: GMT II C
Posts: 261
Nice info, looks like the only rolex with 2 small crowns !
__________________
GMT “Black Panther”
AK 126900
handyhsl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2024, 03:55 PM   #13
drrd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Real Name: rd
Location: uk
Posts: 1,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchik View Post
So what was really changed if anything?
The reference number, dial, case/lugs, crown, seconds hand, movement…maybe more?

The bracelet reference numbers are unchanged.

https://www.ablogtowatch.com/hands-o...ated-for-2023/
drrd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2024, 06:41 PM   #14
handyhsl
"TRF" Member
 
handyhsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bandung
Watch: GMT II C
Posts: 261
Great article !
__________________
GMT “Black Panther”
AK 126900
handyhsl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2024, 10:30 PM   #15
Easy E
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patekfinder View Post
The biggest change IMO is the new 9002 movement is more resistant to magnetism. The older 9001 movement was very easily magnetized and caused problems for many owners, so increasing the resistance to magnetism was one of the major benefits of the new movement.
I’m not so sure about that.
Easy E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2024, 11:14 PM   #16
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patekfinder View Post
The biggest change IMO is the new 9002 movement is more resistant to magnetism. The older 9001 movement was very easily magnetized and caused problems for many owners, so increasing the resistance to magnetism was one of the major benefits of the new movement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Afraid that's not true.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.