3 watches and done, what do you think?

[Daniel23456]

Folks,

Since the arrival of the Polar I am seriously considering trimming down the collection significantly.

The Sub is up for sale and I have a buyer already.
Now I am considering a move with my 16660 as well and ask my AD for a Kermit.

Then I’d have the 124270, 226570, 126610LV and a cheap Seiko to knock around.

Having more watches then 3 + a beater seems redundant for me.


What do you guys think?

[JC316]

Some would say 3 is too many. I say not enough. Do what you feel is best!

[BobtheViking]

3 plus a beater seems to be the sweet spot.

Mine are...

Polar explorer 2
Speedy pro
Black Bay - to be acquired

Beater - pro trek

Then I've got a few sentimental ones I don't really wear.

[Rolexken]

Originally Posted by BobtheViking

3 plus a beater seems to be the sweet spot.

Mine are...

Polar explorer 2
Speedy pro
Black Bay - to be acquired

Beater - pro trek

Then I've got a few sentimental ones I don't really wear.

Snap

My 3

DJ 41
YM 40
Sub

Beater - Citizen NY0040

Sentimental- 1973 Sekonda bought because I got this as a 15yo

[HogwldFLTR]

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

Folks,

Since the arrival of the Polar I am seriously considering trimming down the collection significantly.

The Sub is up for sale and I have a buyer already.
Now I am considering a move with my 16660 as well and ask my AD for a Kermit.

Then I’d have the 124270, 226570, 126610LV and a cheap Seiko to knock around.

Having more watches then 3 + a beater seems redundant for me.


What do you guys think?

Two Explorers is likely two much similarity imho (even though significantly different). If you're happy that's all that matters.

[Malum]

I’m in too deep .

[Easy E]

Originally Posted by malum

i’m in too deep .

+1

[KatGirl]

Originally Posted by Malum

I’m in too deep .

Me, too…..

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[brandrea]

3 and a less expensive alternative is where I’m headed too

[Stealthdriver]

For me personally, 3 is perfect. Right now have:

Black Bay 58 - daily wear and for diving, black dial
Zenith Chronomaster Sport - chronograph and white dial
Grand Seiko Skyflake - dress watch

Also have a moonswatch for relax days outside and such, but that's more of a toy than watch.

[Guppydriver]

I try to go three. I move on from some pieces and feel content for a hot minute. Then, as if by magic, a few months later, there's five or six watches back in my case. It's strange.

[JTL31]

Originally Posted by Guppydriver

I try to go three. I move on from some pieces and feel content for a hot minute. Then, as if by magic, a few months later, there's five or six watches back in my case. It's strange.

You took the words right out of my mouth! Ditto…Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by Guppydriver

I try to go three. I move on from some pieces and feel content for a hot minute. Then, as if by magic, a few months later, there's five or six watches back in my case. It's strange.

Originally Posted by JTL31

You took the words right out of my mouth! Ditto…Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You both understand you can’t store your watches next to each other right?

They’re like rabbits

[Watch-Geek]

Originally Posted by brandrea

You both understand you can’t store your watches next to each other right?



They’re like rabbits

Sent from my SM-A415F using Tapatalk

[Inthesticks]

I currently have 5:

SubC date 40
Yellow Gold / White face DD40
Root beer TT
Kermit MK2
OP39 Rhodium.

There are a few more on my list at the AD. I can easily say I'm done, but if and when I get the call for something on my list, I'd be hard pressed not to take it.

[Dan Pierce]

Although I've gone way over budget & count on the "beaters" this trio covers so many scenarios for me. A smaller group of purposeful watches feels right for me as well.
dP

[Roddypeepa]

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

Although I've gone way over budget & count on the "beaters" this trio covers so many scenarios for me. A smaller group of purposeful watches feels right for me as well.
dP

As ever, Dan doesn’t disappoint with his photography. Nice work!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by Roddypeepa

As ever, Dan doesn’t disappoint with his photography. Nice work!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thank you, Mark!
dP

[pearson1995]

I always like the idea of 3 and a G

In terms of what 3. Smart attire, Travel and a Daily would need to be covered. Personally however I don’t think I could have ‘only’ 3.

[5thLegion]

Originally Posted by pearson1995

I always like the idea of 3 and a G

In terms of what 3. Smart attire, Travel and a Daily would need to be covered. Personally however I don’t think I could have ‘only’ 3.

Agreed - 3 and a G-shock for banging around is about perfect.

I used to think Exp 1, Sub, and Speedy. Speedy is too hard to read to be useful for me. Also, I decided I liked my BB58 better than my maxi-case Sub.

I have no real need for a dress watch, but if I did, a Tank Must would be on that list.

Right now - Exp1, BB58, and a type-A Flieger, I think. Land/sea/air all covered. Looking hard at the manual wind Stowa or Laco.

Might eventually get a 16610, but man, the BB58 is a damn good watch.

[996marty]

3 or maybe 4 is more than enough to rotate and if the need comes to move one or two out to get another in then so be it

[Kevin of Larchmont]

I’ve never personally experienced or understood the concept of satiation. I’m not wired that way, this is a very real reason why I had to quit drinking. Watches are harmless and endlessly fascinating and one new acquisition always seems to dovetail into the next. It can be exhausting. I truly envy those who can be sated with three watches. I can’t stop hunting.

[Rolexken]

Originally Posted by Kevin of Larchmont

I’ve never personally experienced or understood to concept of satiation. I’m not wired that way, this is a very real reason why I had to quit drinking. Watches are harmless and endlessly fascinating and one new acquisition seems to dovetail into the next. It can be exhausting. I truly envy those who can be sated with three watches. I can’t stop hunting.

For me it is about giving every watch enough wrist time to make it worthwhile to own and that has its limits - others will be happy with a large collection that isn’t worn very often.

[Kevin of Larchmont]

Originally Posted by Rolexken

For me it is about giving every watch enough wrist time to make it worthwhile to own and that has its limits - others will be happy with a large collection that isn’t worn very often.

This is very true, the struggle is real. I have a descending order of rotation and the watches at the bottom get worn the least. Still, when they do get worn they are the perfect watch for the circumstance at hand. At least that’s what I tell myself.

[Turpentine]

Three is a good number and I’m pretty content with my diversity
(unless I get that call for a new Daytona lol)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Mr Ben]

Originally Posted by Turpentine

Three is a good number and I’m pretty content with my diversity
(unless I get that call for a new Daytona lol)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The day date/ dial isn’t what I’d personally choose but I like this look - 3 nice watches, all very different.

[Snowballs]

Three is a good start

[jed11]

All about balance…whatever that number and combination may be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Watch-Geek]

I have 20+, but have 4 that cover pretty much anything and could be all you need for a "normal person"

1. Rolex Submariner Date - iconic diver
2. Omega Speedmaster Professional 3861 - iconic chrono
3. Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso DuoFace - dressy AND GMT function
4. DW-5000SL - Screwback square G-shock - 25th anniversary recreation of the first G-Shock from 1983 - beater and also iconic watch

Sent from my SM-A415F using Tapatalk

[Recaro18]

The Chase never ends!