|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 January 2013, 08:30 PM
|
#31 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
6.3-inch wrist here. The 42mm ROOs (incl. the Diver) were all too big for my wrist, with a visible gap at each lugs between the lug and my wrist. So I went for the 39mm 15300ST. Worked out perfectly for me.
With a slightly larger wrist than mine the 42mm ROOs may work out, although the gap between the lugs and my wrist would definitely bug me.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
