ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 July 2014, 04:04 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Jamie
Location: UK
Posts: 96
|
For me, it would be Sub first, fantastic watch
|
28 July 2014, 04:24 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
|
|
28 July 2014, 04:31 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
|
Sub C date would be my choice. I own and enjoy it and the POC 9300.
|
28 July 2014, 05:08 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
SubC but if you need a second timezone then it's a no brainer. Of course this is all subjective based on individual preferences. I don't care about resale, I care about what brings me happiness on my wrist.
|
28 July 2014, 06:05 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,507
|
Both are great.
|
28 July 2014, 06:07 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: yes.. it's Kyu
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 116759SANR
Posts: 1,499
|
I vote subC
I love the BLNR but for some reason every time I decide "today is the day to buy it!" I go in, try it on and leave buying something else |
28 July 2014, 06:22 AM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Ian
Location: NY
Watch: All of them
Posts: 3,245
|
Quote:
Check the for sale section. BLNRs are trading not much below retail.
__________________
Rolex, PPs, Breitling |
|
28 July 2014, 07:00 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
|
I have a GMT and Subc. I would choose the GMT as it wears smaller. But for you, that's probably irrelevant. Take your time and, really, they are both great.
|
28 July 2014, 07:28 AM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
No wrong answer here.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
28 July 2014, 09:42 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Michigan
Watch: SubC GMTII-C
Posts: 93
|
Agree with Furbo! I have the same combo and love them both. If I had to pick one over the other though......the Sub - Timeless. However, you will see a lot of Sub's around - not as many BLNR's around at this point. Don't see as many GMT II-Ceramic LN's around either. |
28 July 2014, 09:49 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
|
]
This
__________________
|
28 July 2014, 09:55 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
|
__________________
|
28 July 2014, 09:55 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 40
|
The BLNR seems to be more popular at the moment. Can't go wrong with a sub though.
|
28 July 2014, 10:09 AM | #44 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,692
|
|
28 July 2014, 10:17 AM | #45 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
28 July 2014, 10:25 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Spartanburg
Posts: 9
|
Both are beautiful watches. Buy the one that speaks to you. If you can see and hold both at the same time, one will whisper beautiful things into your ear more than the other. That's your new rolex.
|
28 July 2014, 10:34 AM | #47 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,472
|
No wrong answer here. Enjoy your choice.
|
28 July 2014, 10:40 AM | #48 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
The Subs and the GMT are equally good daily wearers.
They aren't perfectly equal, as the Sub doesn't offer th time zone feature and the GMT isn't quite as accurate at measuring elapsed time. Which ever one you choose to buy, I would suspect that you will eventually buy the other, so flip a coin.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
28 July 2014, 11:05 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
|
Agreed...though I'm loving my recent addition, I already am thinking about reacquiring the SubC. Like the BLNR, clean, simple and a classic.
|
28 July 2014, 01:24 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 484
|
Blnr
__________________
GMT IIc, Exp II, Speedy Pro If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space. |
28 July 2014, 03:10 PM | #51 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Watch: 16610 V
Posts: 511
|
I'd do SubC.
Consider Sub (16610) if you're sensitive to weight. |
28 July 2014, 04:15 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.