The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 August 2016, 12:00 AM   #31
masyv6
2024 Pledge Member
 
masyv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_Hunter View Post
I may add a 116500 but it will be a year or two
You and me both
masyv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 02:01 AM   #32
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by fskywalker View Post
Neil: I think your RGc tops the new SSc, so no need to have the sibling!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 04:49 AM   #33
BLACKHORSE 6
"TRF" Member
 
BLACKHORSE 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex SS Daytona
Posts: 2,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus09 View Post
white or black?
Black dial
BLACKHORSE 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 04:50 AM   #34
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
I am not as I am very happy with my 116520.

In the future, who knows what will happen.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 05:05 AM   #35
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
Just posted my incoming of the Daytona C, and this was one point that I pondered. Here is what I said on the other thread:

"I thought about selling my 116520 after this one, but they somehow feel quite different, as if the 116520 was a lot more formal, dressy, elegant, while the 500 feels like a purebreed full fledged sports watch."

I feel there's plenty of room for both in a collection.
KBM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 05:06 AM   #36
raclaims
"TRF" Member
 
raclaims's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,624
I've got a zenith white dial, a platona and the new black ceramic...love them all
raclaims is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 05:59 AM   #37
Grnvette65
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 412
Interesting thread, I have a black and white 520 and only wear the black. I love the watch and I'm not a fan of the ceramic. To me it looks like an omega wanna be. now I know I will take heat for that statement but it is my opinion. Actually I was given the opportunity to buy the blk 500 awhile back but did not take it hoping it would go to someone who really wanted it and not a flipper.
Grnvette65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 07:00 AM   #38
redalert
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: California
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 88
from what I'm reading here, most of the guys on here doesn't really like the C. Any particular reason? I personally like it because i like it clean and shiny.
redalert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 08:01 AM   #39
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by redalert View Post
from what I'm reading here, most of the guys on here doesn't really like the C. Any particular reason? I personally like it because i like it clean and shiny.
I think there is a different perception of the 500 with current owners of the 520 vs those new to the SS Daytona.

That is why I am curious if there is a big enough difference for current owners to add the 500 or replace the 520 with a 500.

I know the lume of the 116520 is/was relatively weak. Did Rolex improve the lume of the 500? It could be that my 116520 is from the late 2000s and the lume has started to wear out over time.
jon_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 08:10 AM   #40
ecdc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: US
Posts: 502
No. I prefer the more elegant 116520/black face. I considered the new ceramic bezel'd ones, but ultimately decided to pass. Too sporty (I have plenty of sport/dive watches already), look too much like lots else out there. Before you all criticize me for passing on the "best Daytona evah!" consider that my decision shortened the queue by one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jon_jon View Post
How many owners of the non-ceramic bezel SS Daytona (116520) have ordered or received the new 116500 ceramic bezel Daytona?

I am asking because I have owned the GMT IIc (116710LN) for many years and have never jumped on the BLNR bandwagon.

Likewise, I know Rolex has really hyped up the marketing on the 116500 and the blogs have jumped on the bandwagon, with flippers making a few thousand on these watches.

But is it worth it for current owners of the 116520 to order the new 116500? I am sure I can get one from an AD within 6-12 months. But I am not completely sold on it, unless someone can convince me otherwise.

So if you are a 116520 owner, did you order/receive a 116500 or did you pass on it?
ecdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 02:58 PM   #41
Marcus09
"TRF" Member
 
Marcus09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACKHORSE 6 View Post
Black dial


I've got the white one


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Marcus09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 03:04 PM   #42
WWC
"TRF" Member
 
WWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
Current owner of the 520 and will not be adding the 500 due to the premium and also due to subtle differences such as the bezel.
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST
Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335
Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001
Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630
WWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2016, 09:03 PM   #43
pigman08
"TRF" Member
 
pigman08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tn
Watch: 16610,16710,214270
Posts: 454
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
"as if the 116520 was a lot more formal, dressy, elegant"
My feelings exactly! Having said that, I've been considering flipping my 116520 and a bit of cash for a 16710 and a 214270. I'd get the Pepsi that I've been thirsting for as well as a "more formal , dressy, elegant" look that I believe the Explorer would have with its simplistic styling.
pigman08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2016, 11:54 PM   #44
alex1979
"TRF" Member
 
alex1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 94
Need to see one in metal to decide whether my heart beats more for the ss or c bezel
alex1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2016, 12:16 AM   #45
Chiboy
"TRF" Member
 
Chiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
I am new here, and recently ordered the white dial ceramic Daytona. I recognize the 116520 on the right, but which one is the one in the middle. From the reaction of subsequent posters, I know it's a rare/sought after/vintage one, but am not *yet* up to speed on which Daytonas I should last after once I get mine.
Chiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2016, 12:21 AM   #46
GsurgBM
"TRF" Member
 
GsurgBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough
Posts: 3,759
Yep. Have a black stainless, just added the white ceramic. Perfect mix IMO.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai
GsurgBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2016, 12:46 AM   #47
BlackBay1
"TRF" Member
 
BlackBay1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by GsurgBM View Post
Yep. Have a black stainless, just added the white ceramic. Perfect mix IMO.
Congrats Brad, great duo
__________________

Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono
Black Bay Red
Submariner 114060
Daytona 116520
BlackBay1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2016, 01:14 AM   #48
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by GsurgBM View Post
Yep. Have a black stainless, just added the white ceramic. Perfect mix IMO.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.