ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

WAK4 · 1 January 2018, 09:29 AM

Pretty much always the Sea Dweller for me

Boaters · 1 January 2018, 10:39 AM

Great choice!

Rolexavidfan · 1 January 2018, 11:02 AM

Keep the Sub C ND. Said model may also be discontinued if rumors are true.

Not a fan of SD and I don’t need such features being just a desk diver. Sub C ND has the more modern design.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

douglasf13 · 1 January 2018, 11:29 AM

Keep the SD, or split the difference and sell both to buy a 14060 or 16610.

Bobbyjoon11 · 1 January 2018, 11:37 AM

New sub no doubt! :)

Onikage · 1 January 2018, 11:42 AM

Late pre-ceramic (presumably mint) SD for me. Just sexy.

darwin95 · 1 January 2018, 01:59 PM

16600 for me

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

heygawgaw · 1 January 2018, 03:35 PM

16600 is my favorite.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Vishy26 · 1 January 2018, 03:50 PM

Sea Dweller

CDNWatchNut · 1 January 2018, 03:56 PM

It's a difficult call, I think mainly because the 16600 is out of production and can't readily be re-acquired. If it was still in production, I don't think it would be perceived to be as desireable as it is. So putting aside the relative difference in availability between the two and solely on the aesthetic merits of the watch, comfort, bracelet and overall quality, I think I would keep the sub.

Steerpike999 · 1 January 2018, 07:36 PM

16600 all the way.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

superstarmar · 1 January 2018, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spoonage

My opinion...

Option 1: Keep Both
Option 2: Keep SD

I agree with this ...

mailman · 1 January 2018, 11:31 PM

I'd keep the Sea Dweller. You can pick up a new Sub date anytime

Jakey · 2 January 2018, 12:11 AM

Sea-Dweller - no brainer

dukerules · 2 January 2018, 12:39 AM

Had both a few years ago. Only have the 16600 now.

997 · 2 January 2018, 01:13 AM

Sd

strafer_kid · 2 January 2018, 05:19 AM

I would try to hang onto both!

101031-28 · 2 January 2018, 06:09 AM

Glad you decided to keep the SD, it's a classic.

Roy Rolls · 2 January 2018, 06:13 AM

SD ! No doubt.

1 January 2018, 11:02 AM	#33
Rolexavidfan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Har Location: Tukwila, WA Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,571	Old sea dweller or new sub no date Keep the Sub C ND. Said model may also be discontinued if rumors are true. Not a fan of SD and I don’t need such features being just a desk diver. Sub C ND has the more modern design. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Go for the timepiece you love. You will save more. ...

1 January 2018, 11:42 AM	#36
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	Late pre-ceramic (presumably mint) SD for me. Just sexy. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

1 January 2018, 11:31 PM	#43
mailman TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,510	I'd keep the Sea Dweller. You can pick up a new Sub date anytime __________________ JJ

2 January 2018, 12:39 AM	#45
dukerules "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NC, USA Posts: 681	Had both a few years ago. Only have the 16600 now. __________________ Instagram: dukerules

2 January 2018, 06:09 AM	#48
101031-28 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: USA Watch: 1665 Posts: 4,764	Glad you decided to keep the SD, it's a classic. __________________ He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex. Ian Fleming

1 January 2018, 09:29 AM	#31
WAK4 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Bill Location: NJ Watch: Always changing Posts: 4,172	Pretty much always the Sea Dweller for me

1 January 2018, 10:39 AM	#32
Boaters 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD Posts: 10,653	Great choice!

1 January 2018, 11:29 AM	#34
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,622	Keep the SD, or split the difference and sell both to buy a 14060 or 16610.

1 January 2018, 11:37 AM	#35
Bobbyjoon11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Folsom Posts: 48	New sub no doubt! :)

1 January 2018, 01:59 PM	#37
darwin95 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Northeast Watch: Yourself Posts: 1,020	16600 for me Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1 January 2018, 03:35 PM	#38
heygawgaw "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: California Watch: 16233, 16600 Posts: 119	16600 is my favorite. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1 January 2018, 03:50 PM	#39
Vishy26 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Krishna Location: Australia Posts: 611	Sea Dweller

1 January 2018, 03:56 PM	#40
CDNWatchNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Juan Location: Sherwood Park, Ab Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,509	It's a difficult call, I think mainly because the 16600 is out of production and can't readily be re-acquired. If it was still in production, I don't think it would be perceived to be as desireable as it is. So putting aside the relative difference in availability between the two and solely on the aesthetic merits of the watch, comfort, bracelet and overall quality, I think I would keep the sub.

1 January 2018, 07:36 PM	#41
Steerpike999 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Location: Melbourne Watch: A few..... Posts: 931	16600 all the way. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 January 2018, 12:11 AM	#44
Jakey "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Jake Location: London Watch: SD43 & SS Daytona Posts: 309	Sea-Dweller - no brainer

2 January 2018, 01:13 AM	#46
997 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: SA Posts: 324	Sd

2 January 2018, 05:19 AM	#47
strafer_kid "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Kenny Location: northern ireland Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs Posts: 5,136	I would try to hang onto both!

2 January 2018, 06:13 AM	#49
Roy Rolls "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: New Jersey Posts: 472	SD ! No doubt.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)