The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 January 2015, 10:07 AM   #1
ELITEVIDEOGAMES
"TRF" Member
 
ELITEVIDEOGAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
what do you guys think of the new IWC annual calendar ??

Certainly not my cup of tea but curious what others think
I think their perpetual is so much nicer than this if you want to get some complications. I admit I don't know the price difference.
Name:  IW503502_MOOD.5fd897f10201f0c576c8b925e38951fe.jpg
Views: 389
Size:  103.3 KB
ELITEVIDEOGAMES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 10:27 AM   #2
malarky_hk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: ...
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,466
At first glance it looks good to me. I like symmetry. But haven't read the specs yet. If it's over 42mm then not for me. The perpetual is 44mm I think and waaaay too big IMHO.
malarky_hk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 10:31 AM   #3
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Not so much the diameter but the thickness.
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 10:31 AM   #4
ELITEVIDEOGAMES
"TRF" Member
 
ELITEVIDEOGAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
At first glance I liked it too but after inspection I feel the date windows are too close together and I don't like that the month is on the left side and day of week on the right. Seems jumbled to me.
ELITEVIDEOGAMES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 10:32 AM   #5
ELITEVIDEOGAMES
"TRF" Member
 
ELITEVIDEOGAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
Not so much the diameter but the thickness.
Wow Ben did you get the 5980/1R or is that the dream avatar at the moment ?
ELITEVIDEOGAMES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 11:28 AM   #6
MrJ320
"TRF" Member
 
MrJ320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: James
Location: Toronto
Watch: IG: @j.project
Posts: 2,194
It is 43mm which I think is on the large side. I also think the date apertures are a bit too close together, but the thing that bothers me the most is the word "annual calendar" on the dial. Much prefer the 7 day Portuguese or
Perpetual.
MrJ320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 11:36 AM   #7
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELITEVIDEOGAMES View Post
Wow Ben did you get the 5980/1R or is that the dream avatar at the moment ?
My dream for now....
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 11:55 AM   #8
ELITEVIDEOGAMES
"TRF" Member
 
ELITEVIDEOGAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrJ320 View Post
It is 43mm which I think is on the large side. I also think the date apertures are a bit too close together, but the thing that bothers me the most is the word "annual calendar" on the dial. Much prefer the 7 day Portuguese or
Perpetual.
Website stated 44.2 , so should be same as the perpetual which is too big for my wrist. One cool thing I read on their website is all the 5200 caliber watches will have a slimmer rotor and slimmer bridges to show off more movement going forward. The standard 7 day is on my short list for some time now and this might be the last push.

Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
My dream for now....
I feel you my friend , I dream waaayyyy too much too lol. At least our dreams come true sometimes good luck. BTW off topic how are your thoughts on the moser , still in the honeymoon phase? I love their styling.
ELITEVIDEOGAMES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 12:13 PM   #9
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
My dream for now....
Do it Ben and yes I am wearing mine as I type this.

As for this IWC nah....Not at all for me does nothing.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 12:24 PM   #10
ELITEVIDEOGAMES
"TRF" Member
 
ELITEVIDEOGAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
Do it Ben and yes I am wearing mine as I type this.

As for this IWC nah....Not at all for me does nothing.
There you go Ben you got the green light from the master
Ken you are the ultimate enabler
ELITEVIDEOGAMES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 12:27 PM   #11
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by malarky_hk View Post
If it's over 42mm then not for me.
44.2mm

http://www.iwc.com/en/news/premiere-...nual-calendar/
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 12:28 PM   #12
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELITEVIDEOGAMES View Post
There you go Ben you got the green light from the master
Ken you are the ultimate enabler
I aim to please!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 01:09 PM   #13
diracpoint
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
diracpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELITEVIDEOGAMES View Post
Certainly not my cup of tea but curious what others think
I think their perpetual is so much nicer than this if you want to get some complications. I admit I don't know the price difference.
Does this use an instant day/date/month change mechanism? Or a gradual change?

Thanks!!
diracpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 01:24 PM   #14
ELITEVIDEOGAMES
"TRF" Member
 
ELITEVIDEOGAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by diracpoint View Post
Does this use an instant day/date/month change mechanism? Or a gradual change?

Thanks!!
I believe it's a slow change from what I gathered on the website. I could be wrong though.
ELITEVIDEOGAMES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 02:10 PM   #15
diracpoint
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
diracpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELITEVIDEOGAMES View Post
I believe it's a slow change from what I gathered on the website. I could be wrong though.
Thanks!!
diracpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 02:45 PM   #16
malarky_hk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: ...
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,466
44.2 that's a shame.
malarky_hk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 03:27 PM   #17
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
Do it Ben and yes I am wearing mine as I type this.

As for this IWC nah....Not at all for me does nothing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELITEVIDEOGAMES View Post
There you go Ben you got the green light from the master
Ken you are the ultimate enabler
Thanks for the encouragement guys

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELITEVIDEOGAMES View Post
BTW off topic how are your thoughts on the moser , still in the honeymoon phase? I love their styling.
Yes, still love it very much. It's now kind of like my "beater". The watch is extremely elegant and versatile and just screams quality despite it's wallet-friendly (relative) price. Goes well with suit / long sleeve as well as weekend wear. In particular, I love how the dial changes color and appearance depending on surrounding lighting.

Here'a recent shot.


benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 04:20 PM   #18
CWIN
"TRF" Member
 
CWIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
Not a fan at all. Dislike the text on the dial and most of all the size.
__________________
Instagram @cwin
CWIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 10:58 PM   #19
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,764
Not a fan.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 11:14 PM   #20
WhatTheDeuce
"TRF" Member
 
WhatTheDeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Kyung
Location: Anywhere?
Watch: cha want...
Posts: 4,488
Not sure I like the "combined" look for the month/date/day...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @whatthedeuce_
WhatTheDeuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 11:23 PM   #21
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
Not a huge fan of the windows.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2015, 11:31 PM   #22
agsstructures
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
agsstructures's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,401
Don't like it. Especially the fact that it says Annual Calendar.
agsstructures is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2015, 01:26 AM   #23
JD521
"TRF" Member
 
JD521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
At 44mm it sounds too big on paper. Realize it could always be different on the wrist but on mine, sounds too big.
JD521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2015, 01:56 AM   #24
JohnBaker3
2024 Pledge Member
 
JohnBaker3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: John Baker III
Location: Spring,Texas
Watch: 1971 Red Sub
Posts: 2,222
"what do you guys think of the new IWC annual calendar ??"

LOL...from your thread title, I thought we were going to see 12 awesome centerfolds of IWC's best watches....

January screws everything up related to time; I'm still putting 2014 on my checks...

Hurry up Spring and get here soon....

__________________
As I've grown older, I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing off everyone is a piece of cake.
JohnBaker3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2015, 02:06 AM   #25
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
I like it... I'm a sucker for a blue dialed watch (I'd throw a blue croc strap on it). I'd prefer the day on the left too, as it does seem jumbled.
The legibility has to be 10 xs better than the PC with all the small dials. I know my RO PC was pretty hard to read (though only 39mm).
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2015, 07:53 AM   #26
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
I would like it if……………

The Month and Day were changed around.

So it would read from left to right Day,Date & Month.

Why have they done it, imo, back to front??
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2015, 08:00 AM   #27
diracpoint
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
diracpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat30093 View Post
I would like it if……………

The Month and Day were changed around.

So it would read from left to right Day,Date & Month.

Why have they done it, imo, back to front??
While signing a document we only need month and date (for example, Aug 25th) ... not the day. For such purposes it is easier if month and day are side by side. May be that's the reason ... just my guess,
diracpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2015, 09:16 AM   #28
ELITEVIDEOGAMES
"TRF" Member
 
ELITEVIDEOGAMES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: Long Island NY
Watch: me sell games
Posts: 1,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by diracpoint View Post
While signing a document we only need month and date (for example, Aug 25th) ... not the day. For such purposes it is easier if month and day are side by side. May be that's the reason ... just my guess,
They claim the layout is in tribute to FA Jones (an American ) and they claim this is the American layout. I much prefer day of week, date and month as in today is Sunday, the 18th of January.
ELITEVIDEOGAMES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2015, 12:20 AM   #29
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELITEVIDEOGAMES View Post
They claim the layout is in tribute to FA Jones (an American ) and they claim this is the American layout. I much prefer day of week, date and month as in today is Sunday, the 18th of January.
Tom, that was my guess

Which imo will limit the number of people interested in the watch.

My brain is wired to read the date:

Day, Date & Month
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2015, 03:26 AM   #30
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
I really am not a fan of a watch over 40mm on leather.
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.